Dashboard Benchmark Evaluation Scoring Guide
CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED
Evaluate dashboard metrics with regard to benchmarks set by local, state, or federal health care policies or laws.
Does not analyze dashboard metrics with regard to benchmarks set by local, state, or federal health care policies or laws. Analyzes dashboard metrics, but relationship to benchmarks set by local, state, or federal health care policies or laws is missing or flawed. Evaluates dashboard metrics with regard to benchmarks set by local, state, or federal health care policies or laws. Evaluates dashboard metrics with regard to benchmarks set by local, state, or federal health care policies or laws, and identifies knowledge gaps, unknowns, missing information, unanswered questions, or areas of uncertainty (where further information could improve the evaluation).
Analyze challenges that meeting prescribed benchmarks can pose for a heath care organization or an interprofessional team.
Does not list challenges that meeting prescribed benchmarks can pose for a heath care organization or an interprofessional team. Lists but does not analyze challenges that meeting prescribed benchmarks can pose for a heath care organization or an interprofessional team, or provides a flawed analysis that misses key challenges. Analyzes challenges that meeting prescribed benchmarks can pose for a heath care organization or an interprofessional team. Analyzes challenges that meeting prescribed benchmarks can pose for a heath care organization or an interprofessional team, and identifies assumptions on which the analysis is based.
Evaluate a benchmark underperformance in a heath care organization or an interprofessional team that has the potential for greatly improving overall quality or performance.
Does not evaluate a benchmark underperformance in a heath care organization or an interprofessional team that has the potential for greatly improving overall quality or performance. Provides a partial or flawed evaluation of a benchmark underperformance in a heath care organization or an interprofessional team; misses factors that are key to understanding the potential for improving overall quality or performance. Evaluates a benchmark underperformance in a heath care organization or an interprofessional team that has the potential for greatly improving overall quality or performance. Evaluates a benchmark underperformance in a heath care organization or an interprofessional team that has the potential for greatly improving overall quality or performance, and defends reasoning for selecting this benchmark over another with similar potential for improvement.
Advocate for ethical action in addressing a benchmark underperformance, directed toward an appropriate group of stakeholders.
Does not advocate for ethical action in addressing a benchmark underperformance, directed toward an appropriate group of stakeholders. The attempt to advocate for ethical action is flawed, superficial, or does not address an appropriate group of stakeholders. Advocates for ethical action in addressing a benchmark underperformance, directed toward an appropriate group of stakeholders. Advocates for ethical action in addressing a benchmark underperformance, directed at an appropriate group of stakeholders, and recommends criteria for evaluating the effectiveness of recommended action.
Communicate evaluation and analysis in a professional and effective manner, writing content clearly and logically, with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling.
Does not communicate evaluation and analysis findings and recommendations in a professional and effective manner; does not write content clearly and logically, and does not use correct grammar, punctuation, and spelling. The evaluation and analysis findings and recommendations are not consistently professional, effective, clear, and logical, or errors in use of grammar, punctuation, or spelling distract from the message. Communicates evaluation and analysis findings and recommendations in a professional and effective manner, writing content clearly and logically, with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling. The evaluation and analysis findings and recommendations are professional, effective, and insightful; the content is clear, logical, and persuasive; grammar, punctuation, and spelling are without errors.
Integrate relevant sources to support arguments, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style.
Does not integrate relevant sources to support arguments; does not correctly format citations and references using current APA style. The sources lack relevance or are poorly integrated, or citations or references are incorrectly formatted. Integrates relevant sources to support arguments, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style. Integrates relevant sources to support arguments, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style. Citations are free from all errors.
Need Help Writing an Essay?
Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your paper.
Write My Essay For MeOur essay writing company helps you enjoy campus life. We have committed and experienced tutors and academic writers who have a keen eye in writing original papers for university students. Buy high-quality essays online from our team of professional assignment writers. Every paper we deliver is original and crafted from scratch. Our expertise covers a wide range of assignments, regardless of their difficulty or academic level. From concise essays to extensive research papers, dissertations/theses, and coursework, we handle projects of all sizes.